Chapter C Problem Sheet 3 (Lectures 6-7)

C.1 Legendre 1

Recall that the \(\Phi \)-equation in spherical coordinates is (see Sheet B)

\[ \frac {d^2}{d\phi ^2}\Phi +\cot (\phi )\frac {d}{d\phi }\Phi +\lambda ^\Theta \csc ^2(\phi )\Phi =\lambda ^\Phi \Phi . \]

Verify that the change of variables \(x=\cos (\phi )\) gives

\[ (1-x^2)\frac {d^2}{dx^2}\Phi -2x\frac {d}{dx}\Phi +\frac {\lambda ^\Theta }{1-x^2}\Phi =\lambda ^\Phi \Phi . \]

Further verify that \(\int _0^\pi \Phi (\phi )^2\,\sin (\phi )\,d\phi =\int _{-1}^1 \Phi (x)^2\,dx\).

  • Solution. We note that (using the chain rule and the product rule)

    \begin{gather*} \frac {d\Phi }{d\phi }=\frac {d\Phi }{dx}\frac {dx}{d\phi }, \\ \frac {d^2\Phi }{d\phi ^2}=\frac {d}{d\phi }\left (\frac {d\Phi }{dx}\frac {dx}{d\phi }\right ) =\frac {dx}{d\phi }\frac {d}{d\phi }\frac {d\Phi }{dx}+\frac {d\Phi }{dx}\frac {d}{d\phi }\frac {dx}{d\phi } =\frac {dx}{d\phi }\frac {dx}{d\phi }\frac {d}{dx}\frac {d\Phi }{dx} +\frac {d\Phi }{dx}\frac {d^2x}{d\phi ^2} =\left (\frac {dx}{d\phi }\right )^2\frac {d^2\Phi }{dx^2} +\frac {d\Phi }{dx}\frac {d^2x}{d\phi ^2}. \end{gather*} We have \(\frac {dx}{d\phi }=-\sin (\phi )\) and \(\frac {d^2x}{d\phi ^2}=-\cos (\phi )\) so that the equation becomes (slightly inappropriately mixing variables for clarity)

    \[ \sin ^2(\phi )\frac {d^2}{dx^2}\Phi -\cos (\phi )\frac {d}{dx}\Phi -\cot (\phi )\sin (\phi )\frac {d}{dx}\Phi +\lambda ^\Theta \csc ^2(\phi )\Phi =\lambda ^\Phi \Phi . \]

    Using \(\cot (\phi )\sin (\phi )=\cos (\phi )=x\), \(\sin ^2(\phi )=1-x^2\) and \(\csc ^2(\phi )=\frac {1}{1-x^2}\), this is

    \[ (1-x^2)\frac {d^2}{dx^2}\Phi -2x\frac {d}{dx}\Phi +\frac {\lambda ^\Theta }{1-x^2}\Phi =\lambda ^\Phi \Phi , \]

    as desired.

    We further have (using \(\frac {dx}{d\phi }=-\sin (\phi )\) and that as \(\phi \) goes from \(0\) to \(\pi \), then \(x=\cos (\phi )\) goes from 1 to \(-1\)):

    \[ \int _0^\pi \Phi (\phi )^2\,\sin (\phi )\,d\phi =-\int _{1}^{-1} \Phi (x)^2\,dx =\int _{-1}^1 \Phi (x)^2\,dx, \]

    as desired.

C.2 Legendre 2

Let \(\sigma \geq 0\) be given. Show that the following is a Sturm–Liouville differential equation by writing down \(\a \), \(\b \), \(w\), \(p\) and \(q\) and veryfying that the Sturm–Liouville conditions are satisfied for the coefficient functions:

\[ (1-x^2)u''-2xu'-\frac {\sigma ^2}{1-x^2}u=\lambda u,\qquad \text {with solution space~} L^2(-1,1). \]

  • Solution. From the solution space we see that \(\a =-1\), \(\b =1\) and \(w=1\). The right-hand side of the differential equation therefore is already of the form \(\lambda wu\) and the left-hand side of the differential equation should then equal \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficients of \(u''\) and \(u\) we then read off that \(p=1-x^2\) and \(q=-\frac {\sigma ^2}{1-x^2}\). Since then \(p'=-2x\), this is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). In summary:

    \[ \a =-1,~\b =1, \quad w=1,\quad p=1-x^2,\quad q=\frac {-\sigma ^2}{1-x^2}. \]

    The smoothness assumptions on \(w,p,q\) and the sign conditions on \(w,p\) on the interval \((\a ,\b )\) are clearly satisfied.

C.3 Spherical Bessel 1

Let \(\sigma \geq 0\) and \(b\in (0,\infty )\) be given. Show that the following is a Sturm–Liouville differential equation by writing down \(\a \), \(\b \), \(w\), \(p\) and \(q\) and veryfying that the Sturm–Liouville conditions are satisfied for the coefficient functions:

\[ x^2u''+2xu'-\sigma (\sigma +1)u=\lambda x^2u,\qquad \text {with solution space~} L^2(0,b;x^2). \]

  • Solution. From the solution space we see that \(\a =0\), \(\b =b\) and \(w=x^2\). The left-hand side of the differential equation should then equal \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficients of \(u''\) and \(u\) we then read off that \(p=x^2\) and \(q=-\sigma (\sigma +1)\). Since then \(p'=2x\), this is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). In summary:

    \[ \a =0,~\b =b, \quad w=x^2,\quad p=x^2,\quad q=-\sigma (\sigma +1). \]

    The smoothness assumptions on \(w,p,q\) and the sign conditions on \(w,p\) on the interval \((\a ,\b )\) are clearly satisfied.

C.4 Chebyshev 1

Show that the following is a Sturm–Liouville differential equation by writing down \(\a \), \(\b \), \(w\), \(p\) and \(q\) and veryfying that the Sturm–Liouville conditions are satisfied for the coefficient functions:

\[ (1-x^2)u''-xu'=\lambda u,\qquad \text {with solution space~} L^2\left (-1,1;\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\right ). \]

  • Solution. From the solution space we see that \(\a =-1\), \(\b =1\) and \(w=\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\). Re-writing the differential equation so that the right-hand side equals \(\lambda wu\) gives

    \[ \sqrt {1-x^2}\,u''-\frac {x}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}u'=\lambda \frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}u. \]

    The left-hand side of this equation should then equal \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficients of \(u''\) and \(u\) we then read off that \(p=\sqrt {1-x^2}\) and \(q=0\). Since then \(p'=\frac {-x}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\), this is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). In summary:

    \[ \a =-1,~\b =1, \quad w=\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}},\quad p=\sqrt {1-x^2},\quad q=0. \]

    The smoothness assumptions on \(w,p,q\) and the sign conditions on \(w,p\) on the interval \((\a ,\b )\) are clearly satisfied.

C.5 Chebyshev 2

Assume that \(u\) satisfies the differential equation from Problem C.4 and define \(y(\theta ):=u(\cos (\theta ))\). Determine a differential equation for \(y\) and determine the solution space for \(y\).

  • Solution. We have by the chain rule

    \[ \frac {dy}{d\theta }=\frac {dx}{d\theta }~\frac {du}{dx}=-\sin (\theta )\frac {du}{dx}. \]

    Using the product rule and the chain rule we obtain

    \[ \frac {d^2y}{d\theta ^2}=-\cos (\theta )\frac {du}{dx}-\sin (\theta )\frac {dx}{d\theta }\frac {d^2u}{dx^2} =-\cos (\theta )\frac {du}{dx}+\sin ^2(\theta )\frac {d^2u}{dx^2}. \]

    The original differential equation is

    \[ \sin (\theta )^2\frac {du^2}{dx^2}-\cos (\theta )\frac {du}{dx}=\lambda u, \]

    and we see that this equals \(\frac {d^2y}{d\theta ^2}=\lambda y\).

    Alternatively, we have \(u(x)=y(\arccos (x))\) and (using \(x=\cos (\theta )\), \(\theta =\arccos (x)\))

    \[ \frac {du}{dx}=\frac {dy}{d\theta }\,\frac {d\theta }{dx}=\frac {dy}{d\theta }\,\frac {-1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}, \]

    so that

    \[ \sqrt {1-x^2}\frac {du}{dx}=-\frac {dy}{d\theta }, \]

    and therefore

    \[ \frac {d}{dx}\left (\sqrt {1-x^2}\frac {du}{dx}\right ) =-\frac {d\theta }{dx}\,\frac {d}{d\theta }\frac {dy}{d\theta } =\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\frac {d^2y}{d\theta ^2}. \]

    Hence the differential equation

    \[ \left (\sqrt {1-x^2}\,u'\right )'=\lambda \frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}u, \]

    is equivalent to

    \[ y''=\lambda y. \]

    From our coordinate transformation we have \(\theta \in (0,\pi )\) and we have

    \[ d\theta =\frac {-1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\,dx, \]

    so the solution space \(L^2\left (-1,1;\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\right )\) for \(u\) transforms into the solution space \(L^2(0,\pi )\) for \(y\).

C.6 Laguerre 1

Show that the following is a Sturm–Liouville differential equation by writing down \(\a \), \(\b \), \(w\), \(p\) and \(q\) and veryfying that the Sturm–Liouville conditions are satisfied for the coefficient functions:

\[ xu''+(1-x)u'=\lambda u,\qquad \text {with solution space~} L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x}). \]

  • Solution. From the solution space we see that \(\a =0\), \(\b =\infty \) and \(w=\e ^{-x}\). Re-writing the differential equation so that the right-hand side equals \(\lambda wu\) gives

    \[ x\e ^{-x}u''+(1-x)\e ^{-x}u'=\lambda \e ^{-x}u. \]

    The left-hand side of this equation should then equal \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficients of \(u''\) and \(u\) we then read off that \(p=x\e ^{-x}\) and \(q=0\). Since then \(p'=\e ^{-x}-x\e ^{-x}\), this is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). In summary:

    \[ \a =0,~\b =\infty , \quad w=\e ^{-x},\quad p=x\e ^{-x},\quad q=0. \]

    The smoothness assumptions on \(w,p,q\) and the sign conditions on \(w,p\) on the interval \((\a ,\b )\) are clearly satisfied.

C.7 Hermite 1

Show that the following is a Sturm–Liouville differential equation by writing down \(\a \), \(\b \), \(w\), \(p\) and \(q\) and veryfying that the Sturm–Liouville conditions are satisfied for the coefficient functions:

\[ u''-2xu'=\lambda u,\qquad \text {with solution space~} L^2(-\infty ,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2}). \]

  • Solution. From the solution space we see that \(\a =-\infty \), \(\b =\infty \) and \(w=\e ^{-x^2}\). Re-writing the differential equation so that the right-hand side equals \(\lambda wu\) gives

    \[ \e ^{-x^2}u''-2\e ^{-x^2}u'=\lambda \e ^{-x^2}u. \]

    The left-hand side of this equation should then equal \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficients of \(u''\) and \(u\) we then read off that \(p=\e ^{-x^2}\) and \(q=0\). Since then \(p'=-2x\e ^{-x^2}\), this is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). In summary:

    \[ \a =-\infty ,~\b =\infty , \quad w=\e ^{-x^2},\quad p=\e ^{-x^2},\quad q=0. \]

    The smoothness assumptions on \(w,p,q\) and the sign conditions on \(w,p\) on the interval \((\a ,\b )\) are clearly satisfied.

C.8 Not Sturm–Liouville problems

Show that the following are not Sturm–Liouville problems:

  • (a) \(u''+u'=\lambda u\) with solution space \(L^2(0,1)\),

  • (b) \(xu''+u'=\lambda u\) with solution space \(L^2(-1,1)\),

  • (c) \(u''=\lambda u\) with solution space \(L^2(-1,1;x)\).

  • Solution. (a) From the solution space we obtain that \(w=1\). Therefore the right-hand side is of the form \(\lambda wu\) so that the left-hand side should be of the form \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficient of \(u''\) we have that \(p=1\). Therefore \(p'=0\), but this is inconsistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). Therefore this is not a Sturm–Liouville problem.

    (b) From the solution space we have \(w=1\). Therefore the right-hand side is of the form \(\lambda wu\) so that the left-hand side should be of the form \(pu''+p'u'+qu\). From the coefficient of \(u''\) we have that \(p=x\). Therefore \(p'=1\), which is consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\). We have \(p(0)=0\) and \(0\in (-1,1)\) so that the sign condition on \(p\) is not satisfied. Therefore this is not a Sturm–Liouville problem.

    (c) From the solution space we have \(w=x\). Since \(0\in (-1,1)\) and \(w(0)=0\) we do not have that \(w>0\) on \((\a ,\b )\). Therefore this is not a Sturm–Liouville problem.

    Writing the equation in standard form as \(xu''=\lambda xu\), we can also read off \(p=x\) (which also doesn’t satisfy the sign condition) and \(p'=1\) which is not consistent with the coefficient of \(u'\).

C.9 Legendre 3

Let \(\sigma \geq 0\). For the following Sturm–Liouville data, classify each boundary point as either quasi-regular or non-quasi-regular:

\[ \a =-1,~\b =1, \quad w=1,\quad p=1-x^2,\quad q=\frac {-\sigma ^2}{1-x^2}. \]

  • Solution. By symmetry we only have to consider one boundary point (the other boundary point will be of the same type). We solve \(Du=0\) which is

    \begin{equation} \label {eq:leg}\tag {$\dagger $} [(1-x^2)u']'=\frac {\sigma ^2}{1-x^2}u. \end{equation}

    We first consider the case \(\sigma =0\) in which case the above reduces to

    \[ [(1-x^2)u']'=0, \]

    from which we obtain for \(C_1\) constant

    \[ u'=\frac {C_1}{1-x^2}, \]

    which gives for \(C_2\) constant

    \[ u=\frac {C_1}{2}\ln \left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )+C_2. \]

    We have \(\ln \left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )=\ln (1+x)-\ln (1-x)\) and at \(\b =1\) the first of these summands is continuous. Therefore we consider only the second summand and we have (using standard limits for the “evaluation” of the anti-derivative at zero):

    \[ \int _0^1 |\ln (1-x)|^2\,dx=\int _0^1 \ln ^2(y)\,dy=\left [y\ln ^2(y)-2y\ln (y)+2y\right ]_0^1=2<\infty . \]

    Clearly we also have that \(1\) belongs to \(L^2(0,1)\). This shows that we have two linearly independent solutions in \(L^2(0,1)\), so that \(\b =1\) is quasi-regular. By symmetry, both boundary points are quasi-regular.

    We now consider the case \(\sigma >0\). We make the Ansatz that (for some \(r\in \mR \))

    \[ u(x)=\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^r. \]

    We then have (using the chain and quotient rules)

    \[ u'(x)=2r\frac {(1+x)^{r-1}}{(1-x)^{r+1}}, \]

    so that

    \[ (1-x^2)u'(x)=(1-x)(1+x)u'(x)=2r\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^r, \]

    and therefore

    \[ [(1-x^2)u']'=4r^2\frac {(1+x)^{r-1}}{(1-x)^{r+1}}, \]

    which gives

    \[ (1-x^2)[(1-x^2)u']'=(1-x)(1+x)[(1-x^2)u']'=4r^2\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^r=4r^2u(x). \]

    Since by (\(\dagger \)) this should equal \(\sigma ^2u\), we obtain \(\sigma ^2=4r^2\) which gives

    \[ r=\pm \frac {\sigma }{2}. \]

    We therefore obtain the solutions \(\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^{\sigma /2}\) and \(\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^{-\sigma /2}\). By linearity, any linear combination of these is also a solution and we obtain the general solution (\(\dagger \)).

    It remains to determine when all these solutions are in \(L^2(0,1)\) (considering quasi-regularity of the right boundary point). We have that \(\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^{-\sigma /2}=\left (\frac {1-x}{1+x}\right )^{\sigma /2}\) is continous on \([0,1]\) and therefore in \(L^2(0,1)\), we therefore only have to consider \(\left (\frac {1+x}{1-x}\right )^{\sigma /2}\). The numerator is bounded from above and below on \([0,1]\), so it suffices to consider \((1-x)^{-\sigma /2}\). We have

    \[ \int _0^1 \left |(1-x)^{-\sigma /2}\right |^2\,dx =\int _0^1 (1-x)^{-\sigma }\,dx =\int _0^1 y^{-\sigma }\,dy, \]

    which is finite if and only if \(\sigma <1\). Therefore if \(\sigma <1\) both boundary points are quasi-regular and if \(\sigma \geq 1\) both boundary points are not quasi-regular.

C.10 Spherical Bessel 2

Let \(\sigma \geq 0\) and \(b\in (0,\infty )\) be given. For the following Sturm–Liouville data, classify each boundary point as either quasi-regular or non-quasi-regular:

\[ \a =0,~\b =b, \quad w=x^2,\quad p=x^2,\quad q=-\sigma (\sigma +1). \]

  • Solution. The right boundary point is regular (since the functions \(w,p,q\) satisfy the smoothness assumptions at that point and \(w(\b )>0\) and \(p(\b )>0\)) and therefore quasi-regular.

    The left boundary point is not regular, so we have to investigate further. The equation to solve (\(Du=0\)) is

    \[ \left (x^2u'\right )'-\sigma (\sigma +1)u=0. \]

    We make the Ansatz \(u(x)=x^r\). Then \(u'=rx^{r-1}\) so that \(x^2u'=rx^{r+1}\), which gives \((x^2u')'=r(r+1)x^r\). Substituting this in the differential equation gives

    \[ r(r+1)x^r-\sigma (\sigma +1)x^r=0. \]

    We conclude that \(r(r+1)=\sigma (\sigma +1)\), so that \(r=\sigma \) or \(r=-(1+\sigma )\) and we obtain the general solution \(u(x)=C_1x^\sigma +C_2x^{-(\sigma +1)}\).

    We choose \(\delta =b/2\). We have that \(x^\sigma \) is continuous and therefore belongs to \(L^2(0,b/2;x^2)\) (as the weight \(x^2\) is also continuous and the interval is bounded). We have

    \[ \int _0^{b/2}|x^{-(\sigma +1)}|^2\,x^2\,dx=\int _0^{b/2} x^{-2\sigma }\,dx, \]

    and from standard integrals we know that this is finite if and only if \(-2\sigma >-1\), i.e. \(\sigma <\frac {1}{2}\). Therefore we obtain quasi-regularity of the left boundary point if and only if \(\sigma <\frac {1}{2}\).

C.11 Chebyshev 3

For the following Sturm–Liouville data, classify each boundary point as either quasi-regular or non-quasi-regular:

\[ \a =-1,~\b =1, \quad w=\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}},\quad p=\sqrt {1-x^2},\quad q=0. \]

  • Solution. By symmetry \(-1\) is quasi-regular if and only if \(1\) is quasi-regular, so we only consider \(1\).

    The equation to solve (\(Du=0\)) is

    \[ \left (\sqrt {1-x^2}\,u'\right )'=0. \]

    Integrating this gives

    \[ \sqrt {1-x^2}\,u'=C_1, \]

    where \(C_1\) is a constant. This gives

    \[ u'(x)=\frac {C_1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}, \]

    and integrating this gives

    \[ u(x)=C_1\arcsin (x)+C_2, \]

    where \(C_2\) is a constant. The solution space is \(L^2\left (-1,1;\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\right )\), so for the boundary point \(1\) we consider \(L^2\left (0,1;\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\right )\). We have that the constant function 1 is in this solution space since

    \[ \int _0^1 |1|^2\,\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\,dx=\left [\arcsin (x)\right ]_{x=0}^1=\frac {\pi }{2}. \]

    We also have that \(\arcsin \) is in the solution space since

    \[ \int _0^1 \arcsin ^2(x)\,\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-x^2}}\,dx =\left [\frac {1}{3}\arcsin ^3(x)\right ]_{x=0}^1 =\frac {\pi ^3}{24}. \]

    Hence (using symmetry) both boundary points are quasi-regular.

C.12 Laguerre 2

For the following Sturm–Liouville data, classify each boundary point as either quasi-regular or non-quasi-regular:

\[ \a =0,~\b =\infty , \quad w=\e ^{-x},\quad p=x\e ^{-x},\quad q=0. \]

Hint: You may find it useful to use that \(\frac {\e ^t}{t}\geq \e ^{t/2}\) for all \(t>0\).

  • Solution. The equation to solve (\(Du=0\)) is

    \[ \left (x\e ^{-x}\,u'\right )'=0. \]

    Integrating this gives

    \[ x\e ^{-x}\,u'=C_1, \]

    where \(C_1\) is a constant. This gives

    \[ u'(x)=\frac {C_1}{x}\e ^x, \]

    and integrating this gives

    \[ u(x)=C_1F(x)+C_2, \]

    where \(C_2\) is a constant and

    \[ F(x):=\int _1^x \frac {\e ^t}{t}\,dt. \]

    The solution space is \(L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x})\).

    We first consider the boundary point \(\infty \) and therefore the space \(L^2(1,\infty ;\e ^{-x})\). We have \(1\in L^2(1,\infty ;\e ^{-x})\) since

    \[ \int _1^\infty |1|^2\e ^{-x}\,dx<\infty . \]

    We consider the behavior of \(F\) near infinity. We have by looking at the power series (noting that the terms we omit are nonnegative) for \(z\geq 0\)

    \[ \e ^z\geq 1+z+\frac {1}{2}z^2. \]

    From this we conclude that for \(t\geq 0\)

    \[ \e ^{t/2}\geq 1+\frac {t}{2}+\frac {1}{2}\left (\frac {t}{2}\right )^2. \]

    We have for all \(t\in \mR \) that

    \[ 1+\frac {t}{2}+\frac {1}{2}\left (\frac {t}{2}\right )^2\geq t, \]

    since

    \[ 1-\frac {t}{2}+\frac {1}{2}\left (\frac {t}{2}\right )^2=\frac {1}{2}\left (\frac {t}{2}-1\right )^2+\frac {1}{2}\geq 0. \]

    It follows that for \(t\geq 0\)

    \[ \e ^{t/2}\geq t, \]

    so that for \(t>0\)

    \[ \frac {\e ^t}{t}\geq \e ^{t/2}, \]

    which is the hint given (which may also be used without proof). Integrating this gives for \(x\geq 1\)

    \[ F(x)=\int _1^x \frac {\e ^t}{t}\,dt\geq \int _1^x \e ^{t/2}\,dt =\left [2\e ^{t/2}\right ]_{t=1}^x =2\e ^{x/2}-2\sqrt {\e }. \]

    Hence

    \[ \int _1^\infty F(x)^2 \e ^{-x}\,dx\geq 4\int _1^\infty (\e ^{x/2}-\sqrt {\e })^2\e ^{-x}\,dx =4\int _1^\infty 1-2\sqrt {\e }\,\e ^{-x/2}+\e \,\e ^{-x}\,dx =\infty . \]

    We conclude that \(F\notin L^2(1,\infty ;\e ^{-x})\). Hence the boundary point \(\infty \) is not quasi-regular.

    We now consider the boundary point \(0\) and therefore the space \(L^2(0,1;\e ^{-x})\). We have \(1\in L^2(0,1;\e ^{-x})\) since

    \[ \int _0^1 |1|^2\e ^{-x}\,dx<\infty . \]

    For \(t\in [0,1]\) we have \(1\leq \e ^t\leq \e \) and therefore for \(t\in (0,1)\)

    \[ \frac {1}{t}\leq \frac {\e ^t}{t}\leq \frac {\e }{t}. \]

    Integrating gives for \(x\in (0,1)\)

    \[ \int _{x}^1 \frac {1}{t}\,dt\leq \int _x^1 \frac {\e ^t}{t}\,dt\leq \e \int _{x}^1 \frac {1}{t}\,dt, \]

    which reversing signs gives (noting that reversing the integration limits reverse signs)

    \[ \int _1^x \frac {1}{t}\,dt\geq \int _1^x \frac {\e ^t}{t}\,dt\geq \e \int _1^x \frac {1}{t}\,dt. \]

    This gives

    \[ \ln (x)\geq F(x) \geq \e \ln (x). \]

    Hence

    \[ |F(x)|^2\leq \e ^2|\ln (x)|^2. \]

    It follows that

    \[ \int _0^1 |F(x)|^2\e ^{-x}\,dx\leq \e ^2 \int _0^1 |\ln (x)|^2\e ^{-x}\,dx. \]

    Using \(\e ^{-x}\leq 1\), this gives

    \[ \int _0^1 |F(x)|^2\e ^{-x}\,dx\leq \e ^2\int _0^1 |\ln (x)|^2\,dx =\e ^2\left [x\ln ^2(x)-2x\ln (x)+2x\right ]_{x=0}^1, \]

    which is finite by standard limits. Therefore we have two linearly independent solutions in \(L^2(0,1;\e ^{-x})\) and therefore the boundary point \(0\) is quasi-regular.

C.13 Hermite 2

For the following Sturm–Liouville data, classify each boundary point as either quasi-regular or non-quasi-regular:

\[ \a =-\infty ,~\b =\infty , \quad w=\e ^{-x^2},\quad p=\e ^{-x^2},\quad q=0. \]

Hint: You may use without proof that the Dawson function \(D_+(x):=\e ^{-x^2}\int _0^x \e ^{t^2}\,dt\) behaves like \(\frac {1}{2x}\) near infinity.

  • Solution. By symmetry, \(\infty \) is quasi-regular if and only if \(-\infty \) is quasi-regular, so we only consider \(\infty \).

    The equation to solve (\(Du=0\)) is

    \[ \left (\e ^{-x^2}u'\right )'=0. \]

    Integrating this gives

    \[ \e ^{-x^2}u'=C_1, \]

    where \(C_1\) is a constant. This gives

    \[ u'(x)=C_1\e ^{x^2}, \]

    and integrating this gives

    \[ u(x)=C_1 G(x)+C_2, \]

    where \(G\) is the anti-derivative of \(\e ^{x^2}\) which satisfies \(G(0)=0\) and \(C_2\) is a constant. The solution space is \(L^2(-\infty ,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2})\), so for the boundary point \(\infty \) we consider \(L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2})\). We have \(1\in L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2})\) since

    \[ \int _0^\infty |1|^2\e ^{-x^2}\,dx<\infty . \]

    We now consider whether or not \(G\) belongs to \(L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2})\). Noting that \(G(x)=\int _0^x \e ^{t^2}\,dt\), so that \(\e ^{-x^2}G(x)=D_+(x)\) we have

    \[ \int _0^\infty |G(x)|^2\e ^{-x^2}\,dx=\int _0^\infty G(x)D_+(x)\,dx. \]

    Since \(\e ^{t^2}\geq 1\), we have \(G(x)\geq x\). Using that \(D_+(x)\) behaves like \(\frac {1}{2x}\) near infinity (as given in the question), we then have that the integrand \(GD_+\) is bounded from below by a positive constant near infinity. It follows that \(\int _0^\infty G(x)D_+(x)\,dx=\infty \). Hence \(G\notin L^2(0,\infty ;\e ^{-x^2})\). It follows that \(\infty \) is not quasi-regular. By symmetry, neither boundary point is then quasi-regular.