Alon Serper's Web Pages 
Salvador Dali
As from
June 1, 2012, I am testing, piloting and developing my applied dialectical
method at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) in Port Elizabeth,
South Africa. The Psychology department
of NMMU very kindly agreed to host my National Research Foundation (NRF)
fellowship. I should like to thank both
the NRF and NMMU for this opportunity.
Here is the
Facebook page for my applied dialectical method and my NMMU fellowship:
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=welcome#!/pages/Applied-dialectical-method-of-improving-participants-quality-of-life/137824809676592
And here is
the department’s homepage
http://psychology.nmmu.ac.za/Home
PhD thesis
I should
like to thank my PhD examiners – Prof. Andrew Stables of the University of Bath
and Prof. Richard Smith of Durham University - for making the Viva Voce
examination a very enjoyable educational experience for me and for enabling me
to properly relax and gather myself, for really dialoguing with me and
listening to me and for enabling me to learn from their wisdom and gain
confidence, whilst in an intense examination process, and to convince them that
there might be something here after all.
I should
also like to thank here in this space to Prof. Karl Rogers of Cornwall (not
England) and the University of Buenos Aires (UBA) and
Dr Shlomo Kariv of Haifa
University for their support, patience, and wisdom over the last decade and
through the most anxious stages of this work and life.
The University of Bath chapter – a
significant part of my life and growth – is reaching the end. I got my PhD and am preparing for the next
chapter. I have produced this website in
2003. A lot of water has gone and flown
through in the river of life and I am finding it very difficult to recognise
the person I were then. I have a lot of
disagreements with him on and over many issues and am happy he managed to
learn, self-educate and progress and move on.
Unless something drastic will happen over the next few months and my
dedicated readers revolt and protest in Trafalgar
square, the Computer Services of the University of Bath will remove this
website from their server.
The plan is to continue these ideas as a
proper educational work where I work with other people on their qualitative
transformation and empowerment, well-being, healing, self-care and
relationships with self and other people.
I really had more than enough of me and am yearning to work with, help
and support other people with their enquiries and co-enquire and engage with
them, with the emphasis being on them and their well-being, education,
psychology, ontology and empowerment and progress.
I am looking forward to working with,
helping and supporting others as a matured and self-educated Doctor educator, ontologist and
psychologist and am excited, energised and hopeful by and about these
possibilities.
Written
in November 2003
Please
note that underlined text means you can click and access a paper/writing
Who am
I? Who is Alon Serper? How have I become
who I am/he/it is? Do I fulfil my
values/ideas/ontological principles of whom I wish
myself to become and be in my becoming/emergence in the world? How? I happen to
be me/him/it so I ask those questions.
You can
and should do the same. You are you. This means that you are not
me. I ask those questions throughout my entire being here. I hope
to benefit from it in my ambitions, desires, values, goals and objectives in
regard to my journeys, quests and searches that accompany my existing in the
world. And I feel condemned to ask it.
Other questions. Is there a way to have an
answer to this first question above? So many theories and models tried
and I believe failed miserably as they swallowed and tailored and catered the
human subject in them.
Is this
question above rhetorical? Does it make sense? Is it purely academic? Is
there a way to study it and account for it? Is there a practical way? Is there
a way to have anything that does not end with a question mark in dealing with
it and/or dealing with anything? What is the best fashion to deal with
it?
Well,
let me try. Questions are beautiful. They are real knowledge.
The only knowledge that is available to us. Being able to formulate
questions is a good source of self-pride, of authenticity and of coping with
existing in the world.
Knowledge
is all about confusion and chaos. To be wise and knowledgeable means to
be able to show a valid system and order in the chaos and confusion by which to
deal with them. Questions are an excellent way to do so.
Still,
let me toy with some ideas and thoughts. Hopefully, those ideas will
elicit questions and confusion. The more the better.
The
object here is to have a practical heuristic tool and epistemology in the
discipline/study of the human subject and human existence and the social and
human sciences so as to tackle this question.
The aim
is to do so in a manner that will give us gratification, meaning, authenticity,
peace of mind, satisfaction, ontological security, sense-making, rigour,
happiness and pleasure. As those are unique, dynamic and changing
individualistic and personal features then it is up to each one of us to
construct and find out what they mean for him/her and to follow his/her
findings throughout every point of his/her being in the world.
I am a
human subject in the world. I am a totality in the world.
This
means the following assumptions:
1. I am
not an object.
2. I am
here.
3. I am
here as me. I am here as my self.
4. There
is nothing but me as far as I am concerned.
5. Thus,
since there is nothing but me for me and I see and feel you there and should
assume that you are there in the world too and that there is something there in
the world that is not me, namely you, then I assume that there is nothing but
you to you as far as you are concerned just as it is for me.
6.
Hence, we are all totalities, very much different, unique, personalised beings
in the world.
7. This
is my existence. This is my being in the world. This is my
consciousness. This is my perception. This is my conception.
8.
You are part of my consciousness, of my internal world, of me. I am part of
your world, of your consciousness, of your being in the world.
9. We
can merely relate to each other through our acknowledgement of our totality,
mine, your’s, his’, her’s and their’s. This acceptance would enable us to
tolerate and accept ourselves and the social others unconditionally (Carl
Rogers) without totalising the other. This acknowledgement and awareness
will enable learning from and interrelating to/with others and with/to
ourselves.
Hence, I
am here and cannot be reduced to anything but myself. I should assume the
same for you. Naturally, this means I (assuming you/us) cannot be
generalised, theorised, categorised and collectivised to anything else. I
(assuming us/you) cannot be mechanised, objectified and defined/determined by
anything or anyone but myself, assuming us/you.
I
construct myself and become whoever/whatever I wish myself to become and be by
being/existing here and living here, acting, choosing, constructing,
reconstructing myself accordingly.
I become
and am by being susceptible, receiving and absorbing, engaging, relating and
interrelating in the world to and with both myself and the social others in
creating, constructing and reconstructing myself in the world
accordingly.
I am
active. I take responsibility. I initiate and devise a very personalised, dynamic process of being in the world to
firmly determine my totality in the world. I am this process. And
this process is me. Without this I am nothing. Without this I am
not me.
I, thus,
constantly observe, analyse, assess, reflect, dereflect and select. I
constantly change, modify, create and become different versions of myself in
accordance with whatever I sense/feel/believe is the most appropriate being in
the world for me to become and be at that specific tempo-spatial moment of my
existence in the world.
I have
values I try to fulfil. I have goals I strive to achieve. I have
objectives I wish to actualise. I have meanings I endeavour to construct
and act out. I have ambitions I wish to live and try out. I
constantly create those in accordance with whom/what I wish to become and be at
that specific point of my existence in the world and live according to them so
as to create and construct whom/what I wish myself to become and be.
Because
I live and act, take initiative and responsibility for myself and constantly
choose and select I make mistakes. I endeavour to learn from those.
I wish to improve. If I am already here then I ought to go forward and
progress rather than backwards. As I emerge and become I wish to learn
from my experiences of being here. I also wish to learn from the others’
(those totalities who are not me) experiences of their own process of being here
in the world.
I have
constructed and attained flaws I wish to eliminate and modify. Perhaps I
have achieved some strengths. I wish to
strengthen and reinforce them in and throughout my being here in the world.
I assume
my existence by living, acting and existing, by being conscious, by being
conscious of my consciousness. As a living/existing/conscious being in
the world I am certain of my death. I am aware of the fact that I am a
finite being in the world. It will all end at some point. At some point
I shall cease to be.
Death is
the only thing that can reduce and mechanise me. It does so into
nothing. I am because I am alive here.
I wish
to do everything within my power so that a second prior to my death, I would be
able to look back and say to myself that it was all worthwhile. I wish to
be able to say to myself that I have indeed, done my utmost, my very best, to
construct the most appropriate, the most fulfilling, the most gratifying
version of myself that I could have done for myself.
As I
have no clue when my existence would terminate I must be and make sure that I
leave no chances and that every second of my being in the world, every decision
I take and implement, every choice I make, is the most authentic, meaningful
and beneficial to myself and my process of becoming and being me, or in other
words the best version of me that I can be in those circumstances and at that
specific point of my existence.
I have
to be completely sure that I have actualised and fulfilled the best potentialities
available to me at that specific moment of my being in the world to their
fullest extent. I have to be certain that I have done my very best
so as to do so.
I think
I owe it to myself. I did not choose to be here. I was launched
into this existence (Heidegger’s Being and Time). This was the only time
in my existence where I have been and will ever be passive. This was the
only decision/choice that was and will ever be made, carried out and
implemented for me throughout the course of my entire existence.
This
decision to exist was chosen for me by two individuals who are not me, namely
the others, other totalities in the world. They took responsibility
for/of my initial being here. They put me here. They turned me from a
non-being into a being in the world. Then, everything else became up to
me.
I did
not choose to be here. Yet I choose to emerge and become and be
whatever/whoever I am and will be. I have to be accountable for this
choice and take responsibility for it.
Fine, I
am here then. I have to assume this fact and live with it. I now
have to be sure that I do it rightly, in the best, most fulfilling manner for
myself that I can. This is my only ‘job’. This is my sole duty.
This is my only obligation. This is my sole responsibility. I owe
nothing to anyone but myself. No one owes me anything. I have to
become and be. That’s all there is to it.
I use
the social others, their totalities and the external world in fulfilling myself
and whom/what I desire for myself to become and be. I sincerely hope the
social other does the same with me. I am available for him/her to do
so.
I share
the world I am found in with the social others. One of the manners I can
define and interrelate to/with myself is through the way I interrelate with the
others. It reflects upon me. It reflects upon how I perceive myself
and my goals/ambitions. I do so for me not him/her/them.
The
social others are part of my being and becoming in the world. This is
their role as far as I am concerned. I sincerely hope I play the same
role for them/you.
The
world will be such a better place if we would focus and concentrate upon
ourselves and our beings/becoming in the world, upon improving ourselves as
individum/s and our own, personalised, being/becoming here in the world.
All
those collectives, groupings and categories destroy us and our common, shared
world. They give us an opportunity to escape and become alienated from
ourselves and our responsibilities, in general and towards ourselves, in particular,
that are the same.
The only
truth is an individualistic and personalised one of what is
good/true/authentic/meaningful for myself/ourselves.
As such, it is wholly irrational and passionate and very much subjective.
There is
no universal, objective and collective truth. We can share truth as
individualised and personalised truth. We cannot synthesise and
generalise/collectivise truth.
Hence,
the only truth for me is my own truth. I create, construct and
reconstruct it and live, construct and reconstruct my being in the world
accordingly.
Each
individum is a total whole in the world. The whole is extremely complex. The
whole is much greater than the sums of its parts. The whole is the only
thing that there is.
I
enclose some writings below that can give some sort of an idea of what I strive
to achieve, whom/what I wish to be and become, whom I was when I wrote the
final version of this writing, my values and desires, my internal conflicts, my
living contradictions, my objectives and my ambitions.
Those
writings are the parts that make up the totality that is far greater than
them. I am greater than everything. I am greater than all the
attempts to analyse and understand me. I am greater than all my
endeavours to explicate and analyse myself. I am much greater than all my
writings about myself. I am greater than all the words that can be
uttered about me.
On the
other hand, I am just me. I exist here in the world. That’s
all. I am the product of my own life and being/becoming. This is all
there is to it. I need to be considered and studied as such. If
not, then what are the alternatives? And I expect an answer for I have no
answers and I really wish to know.
I am
well aware that most of those ideas I have been putting here are well worn out
as a philosophy of existence. It can be considered as the saying of a
flower boy from the 1960s who rebels and protests against the
establishment. Yet I am very much part of the establishment. I am
the establishment. I derive my power and strength from the
establishment.
I feel
that as a theory I have very little more to originate and say. A lot of
it is already internalised and is common sense. Therapists act it out by
virtue of being human beings and their own personas. Post-moderna has lost
its youth and vitality. It has pretty much become like a mature
middle-aged person.
I,
therefore, try to engage with those ideas as heuristic tools for the creation
of a well-structured, integrative constructive/ing critical empirical
psychology as the discipline/structure/framework of the human subject/existence
in the world and their studies. I try to implement those ideas in a very
practical manner within the empirical framework.
I wish
to turn a counter movement of a critic of mainstream establishment into a
contribution towards a well-structured, integrative construction of a
mainstream establishment, along with other epistemologies and heuristic
tools. Enough of critics just for the sake of
criticising. They lead nowhere on their own. The thing
to do is to construct and create alternatives, based upon
ideas/thoughts/values/acts/interrelationships, not so much to critic.
Hence, I
try to devise and form a whole epistemology for the ontology of the human
existence and human subject in the social and human sciences. It will be
made available along side other relevant epistemologies and heuristic
tools.
I wish
to create an area of study completely dedicated to this conception of the human
subject and human existence as I displayed here. I endeavour to create a
post-positivistic alternative to radical constructionism, both social and
cognitive, in the social and human sciences.
My goal
and primary academic objective is to switch things around and for the human
subject to control and determine his/her own study as him/her. Such
accounts will be shared and interrelated to show firsthand what it is to
be/become a human subject in the world.
I am
giving a voice to the human subject to speak out, say and shout his piece to
everything that has attempted/attempts to speak on his/her own behalf. I
still have to establish what gave it (this ‘everything’) the right to try and
do this, who has placed it in such a position if anyone did at all?
I expect
this ‘everything’ to be silenced and listen to the human subject in the
world. And believe me, this human subject knows best. He/she is
strong, powerful, smart, wise and capable. More importantly, he/she is
there and lives his/her life and being in the world. I know. I am
one. So are you. So is he/she. So are they.
I
endeavour to do so in a well-structured, rigorous, valid, standardised,
reliable, scholarly, focused academic fashion.
I wish this manner to be differentiated and distanced as much as
possible from folk psychology.
Final Draft of Bath Ph.D. Thesis
§ Proposal for an Action Research
Living Theory
The
above paper has been successfully refereed and accepted: It can now be accessed
with my Biographical details alongside the other accepted submissions at Boog,
B. and Slagter, M. (Eds.). (2006). WCAR 2006 proceedings: on a
CD: Copyright Hanze University of Professional Education. I am sincerely hoping
to follow the correct practice, ethics, etiquette and ethos here, though not
sure what it is
§ Abbreviated Thesis (Serper, 1999)
- A
Study of the Conception of Man in Empirical Psychology by Using Textual
Analysis – This thesis was accepted by the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem as part of the requirement for the completion of a unique
Interdisciplinary Individual Graduate Programme – by research, residence and interdisciplinary
taught courses/seminars – 1994-1999.
Members of this programme devise their own area of study, rather than
engaging in research within an existing discipline/area. The 2003 research report,
below, summarised this part of my work/project.
§ Twenty-five Analysed
Auto-ethnographical Accounts of my ontological/phenomenological existence/being
in the world are currently sitting in my personal drive and are awaiting
ethical and self-embodied morality (of being and/or wanting to be a decent
human being) clarification and assurance, self-assurance. They will be posted here, in the public domain
as soon as this issue is cleared. I do
acknowledge my social others’ feelings and existence in my being/becoming in
the world, especially those social others who are close to my heart.
§ Article: Cry My Beloved Country -
Haaretz – Taken and retrieved from ‘Haaretz’ on Sunday, 11th of January, 2004. - The
article talks about the fight of the Self with the self. And
discusses the dilemmas, problems and contradictions in calling for external,
outside assistance. ‘Who is going to save us from ourselves’? Asks the author. And goes on to conclude “when the
beloved country does not cry out itself, only curls inwardly in indifference,
there is no choice but to turn to the world, so that it cries out instead.”
§
Self in the
World - Me, Me and Me – The fight of the Self with the Self for progress. And the role of the ‘you’
§ Objectives
§
My
Current life – This research is everything to me. I live it.
I eat it. I smell it. I sleep it.
I make love to it. I interrelate
it. I am it. It is me. I am condemned to
it. I am a possessed man. There is no
escape from it. I apologise to all of
those whose lives have been affected. I
must do it.
§
Questions for a discussion of my
work with the Bath Living-Action-Research Monday Group- 1st of
March, 2004
§
Prompt and Short thanking
letter to the Bath Living-Action-Research Group following the meeting of the 1st
of March, 2004 which was dedicated to my work.
§
Communicating My Inner World
of My Work and Ideas to the Living Action Research Monday Conversation Group
§
Thinking, Contemplating and
Writing My Ideas: My Inner World
§
Dali
§
The case
against self-contemplation – International Herald Tribute 30/12/2005
Your thoughts and inputs
(in the form of electronic mails) are crucial to me in my process of becoming
and being myself in the world, in constructing and
reconstructing my self. Your thoughts and reflections will become a
property of my inner world and self. They will become available to my
inner world.
I shall interrelate with them
as parts of the external inputs that nourish and enrich the internal
world. I thrive on these external inputs, perspectives and
insights. They provide me with other ways of interrelating to similar
questions and dilemmas, with different beings in the world.
I shall interrelate with
the interrelationship between my self and your external perspective, insights
inputs. Your insights and viewpoints help me become and be. They
assist me to construct and reconstruct myself. They help me in my internal
struggles with myself. They will provide me with some of the materials
with which I construct myself.
They are beneficial to me
precisely because they are derived from a world and totality that are not my
own. They are external to my own. They provide me with an external
perspective and insight in my internal wars and struggles with myself.
They serve as heuristics in
the relationship I am having with my self. They assist me with the
dilemmas I am having with myself in my construction, becoming and being.
They help me in my self constructed contradictions, paradoxes and
questions. They help me in my construction and assessment of values and
meanings.
I have
created an email forum community in which we can enrich the totality of
ourselves and the other and through this enrichment enrich ourselves.
§
My
community’s email forum is
alonserper@jiscmail.ac.uk
§
The
Archives of the emails may be reviewed at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/alonserper.html
Some
of my ideas, comments, thoughts, interactions, interrelationships,
dereflections, characteristics, values, ambitions, feelings and reflections are
displayed in the Living-Action-Research email forum (from July/2003 onwards),
either on their own or in the context of others’ ideas and dialectical
engagement and conversations with them.
This writing to the forums displays and reveals several aspects/beings
of ‘me’, which are different and autonomous and progressing according to and in
the here and now.
§ http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/living-action-research.html
My
work and ideas will be presented and discussed at the British Educational
Research Association Practitioner-Researcher Workshop/Seminar, to be held at
the University of Bath, England, on the 19th
of June, 2004. In this Seminar/Workshop
Living-Action-Researchers and Practitioner Researchers will meet to interrelate
and discuss their own project and to contribute to one another.
This
endeavour is discussed, in details, at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A0=bera-practitioner-researcher&T=0
It
is recommended to start with the month of February and to move onward from
there.
And
by either emailing myself or/and Dr. Jack Whitehead mailto:A.J.Whitehead@bath.ac.uk; http://www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/
§ The British
Educational Research Association Practitioner Research Special Interest Group,
of which myself and my work are part of, is described
here.
§ As I said earlier,
we have met on the 19th of June, 2004. The members are sending their remarks to the
designated electronic mail forum, above, and at
§
My
personal email is
a.serper@bath.ac.uk
§ Examples of
Comments to the writings above
§ and their usage:
§ And
§ By Others
The
link to the present web pages is found in the award winning (2000) web site for
Action Research www.actionresearch.net.
The web
site www.actionresearch.net
was a Links2Go Award Winner in 2000 and is widely acknowledged as one of the
most influential sites for worldwide developments in action research.
The
link to my Web pages is found at www.actionresearch.net/otherpages.shtml
or http://www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/otherpages.shtml.
This
can give a good feel of what is going on within the domains of Action Research,
Living Action Research, Self-Study and Practitioner Research and theories of
Logic.
I am
in constant interrelationships with the Living Educational Theory Approach to
Research and Action Research to which I try to complement, add and contribute
my own passion and life project
A photograph of a self-study ontologist (circled) and
self-educator (probably because no one else can educate me) with self-study
teachers of others. Or
http://educ.queensu.ca/~ar/sstep5/castle5r.bmp
An Original Copy of My Grandmother’s Birth
Certificate: Bendin (1909)
Going back to the
initial core question I started with. I
have come across a quote by Diderot compiled by Dr. Shlomit Shuster in her
excellent ‘A PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTITIONER'S NOTEBOOK OF QUOTATIONS (c)
19-9-1996.’ . http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/5914/pc-quote.html. All rights reserved to Shlomit Shuster.
"The
Devil take me if I really know who I am"